Contents
Prologue
First Part
On the Necessity of Revealed Doctrine
Single Question: Whether it was necessary for man in this present state that some doctrine be supernaturally inspired. | Num. 1 |
I. Controversy between Philosophers and Theologians | Num. 5 |
A. Opinion of the Philosophers | Num. 5 |
B. Rejection of the Opinion of the Philosophers | Num. 12 |
II. Solution of the Question | Num. 57 |
III. On the Three Principal Reasons against the Philosophers | Num. 66 |
IV. To the Arguments of the Philosophers | Num. 72 |
V. To the Principal Arguments | Num. 90 |
Second Part
On the Sufficiency of Revealed Doctrine
Single Question: Whether the supernatural knowledge necessary for the wayfarer is sufficiently handed on in Sacred Scripture. | Num. 95 |
I. On the Truth of Sacred Scripture | Num. 99 |
II. Principal Response to the Question | Num. 120 |
III. To the Principal Arguments | Num. 121 |
Third Part
On the Object of Theology
Question 1: Whether theology is about God as about its first object. | Num. 124 |
Question 2: Whether Theology is about God under some special Idea | Num. 133 |
Question 3: Whether Theology is about Everything by Way of Attribution of them to its First Subject | Num. 139 |
I. Preliminary Remarks | Num. 141 |
II. On the Necessary Part of Theology | |
A. To the First Question, speaking of Theology in itself. | Num. 151 |
B. To the Second Question, speaking of Theology in itself | Num. 158 |
C. To the First Question, speaking of Our Theology | Num. 168 |
III. On Contingent Theology | Num. 169 |
IV. On Christ as First Object | Num. 172 |
V. To the Principal Arguments of the First Question | Num. 183 |
VI. To the principal Arguments of the Second Question | Num. 192 |
VI. To the Third Question | |
A. Opinion of Others | Num. 196 |
B. Scotus’ own Response | Num. 200 |
VII. To the principal Arguments of the Third Question | Num. 207 |
Fourth Part
On Theology as a Science
Questions 1 and 2: Whether theology in itself is a science, and whether it is subaltern-ing or subaltern-ed | Num. 208 |
I. To the First Question | Num. 208 |
II. To the Second Question | Num. 214 |
Fifth Part
On Theology insofar as it is a Practical Science
Question 1: Whether theology is a practical or a speculative science Num. 217 | |
Question 2: Whether a science is called practical per se from order to action as to its end | Num. 223 |
I. What Action [Praxis] is | Num. 228 |
II. How Practical Knowledge is Extended to Action | Num. 236 |
III. From what Source Knowledge gets its Extension to Action Num. 239 | |
IV. To the Second Question | Num. 265 |
V. To the First Question | |
A. The Opinion of Others | Num. 270 |
B. Scotus’ own Opinion | Num. 314 |
VI. To the Principal Arguments of the First Question | Num. 345 |
VII. To the Principal Arguments of the Second Question | Num. 356 |