1. Nothing of the Bread Remains after the Conversion
311. The first point may be supposed to have been proved by the reasons given against the first opinion [nn.302-305].
![]() | ![]() |
All Collections
>
The Ordinatio of John Duns Scotus > Ordinatio. Book 4. Distinctions 8 - 13. > book four. distinctions 8 - 13
> eleventh distinction. first part: about conversion or transubstantiation
> second article: about the actuality of transubstantiation
> question two. whether the bread is annihilated in its conversion into the body of christ
> i. to the question
> c. scotus’ own opinion
> 1. nothing of the bread remains after the conversion ![]() The Ordinatio of John Duns Scotus ![]() Ordinatio. Book 4. Distinctions 8 - 13. Book Four. Distinctions 8 - 13
Eleventh Distinction. First Part: About Conversion or Transubstantiation
Second Article: About the Actuality of Transubstantiation
Question Two. Whether the Bread is Annihilated in its Conversion into the Body of Christ
I. To the Question
C. Scotus’ own Opinion
1. Nothing of the Bread Remains after the Conversion
|
1. Nothing of the Bread Remains after the Conversion311. The first point may be supposed to have been proved by the reasons given against the first opinion [nn.302-305]. |
© Copyright 1989-2024 InteLex. All Rights Reserved.
InteLex, NLX and PAST MASTERS are trademarks of InteLex Corporation.