SUBSCRIBER:


past masters commons

Annotation Guide:

cover
The Ordinatio of John Duns Scotus
cover
Ordinatio. Book 1. Distinction 3.
Frontmatter
Contents

Contents

Book One

Third Distinction. First Part: About the Knowability of God

                                   
Question One: Whether God is Naturally Knowable by the Intellect of the Wayfarer Num. 1 
Question Two: Whether God is the First Thing Naturally Known by Us in this State of Life Num. 6 
   I. Clarification of the First Question Num. 10 
   II. Opinion of Others to Each Question Num. 20 
   III. Scotus’ own Response to the First Question Num. 24 
      A. A Quidditative Concept of God Can be Obtained Num. 25 
      B. About a Concept Univocal to God and Creatures Num. 26 
      C. God Cannot be Known under his Proper Idea Num. 56 
      D. About the Concept of Infinite Being Num. 58 
      E. God is Known through the Species of Creatures Num. 61 
   IV. To the Arguments of the First Question Num. 63 
   V. Scotus’ own Response to the Second Question Num. 69 
      A. About the Order of Origin of Intelligibles Num. 71 
      B. About the Order of Perfection (and Adequacy) in Intelligibles Num. 95 
   VI. To the Arguments for the Second Question Num. 100 
Question Three: Whether God is the Natural First Object that is Adequate Relative to the Intellect of the Wayfarer Num. 108 
   I. Opinion of Others 
      A. First Opinion Num. 110 
      B. Second Opinion Num. 125 
   II. To the Question Num. 129 
      A. Of What Sort the Univocity of Being is and to What Things it Extends Num. 131 
      B. About the First Object of the Intellect Num. 137 
      C. Arguments against the Univocity of Being and their Solution Num. 152 
   III. About the Other Transcendentals Num. 167 
   IV. Doubt about the First Object of the Intellect for this Present State Num. 185 
   V. To the Initial Arguments Num. 189 
Question Four: Whether any Certain and Sincere Truth could Naturally be Known by the Intellect of the Wayfarer without a Special Illumining of Uncreated Light Num. 202 
   I. Opinion of Henry Num. 208 
   II. Attack on Henry’s Opinion and Solution of the Question Num. 218 
      A. Against the Fundamental Reasons Adduced  Num. 219 
      B. Against the Opinion in Itself  Num. 229 
      C. Against the Fundamental Reasons insofar as they are Less Probative  Num. 246 
      D. Against the Conclusion itself of the Opinion  Num. 258 
      E. Solution of the Question  Num. 261 
      F. Once More Against the Fundamental Reasons Adduced  Num. 280 

Second Part. About the Footprint (or Vestige)

              
Single Question: Whether in Every Creature there is a Footprint of the Trinity Num. 281 
   I. To the Question  Num. 285 
      A. On the Idea of Footprint 
         1. Opinion of Others  Num. 286 
         2. Against this Opinion  Num. 289 
         3. Scotus’ own Opinion  Num. 298 
      B. About Ratification and Somethingness 
         1. Opinion of Others  Num. 302 
         2. Rejection of the Opinion 
            a. First Rejection of the Opinion  Num. 310 
            b. Another Rejection of the Opinion  Num. 320 
         3. Scotus’ own Opinion  Num. 323 
         4. To the Reasons for the Rejected Opinion  Num. 324 
   II. To the Initial Arguments  Num. 330 

Third Part. About the Image1

                                                                                     
Question One: Whether in the Intellective Part Properly Taken there is a Memory that has an Intelligible Species Naturally Prior to the Act of Understanding   Num. 
   I. To the Question 
      A. The Opinion of Others   Num. 340 
      B. Scotus’ Response and his own Opinion   Num. 348 
         1. Reasons on the Part of the Universality of the Object Num. 352 
         2. Reasons on the Part of the Presence of the Object   Num. 366 
         3. Scotus’ Concluding Opinion   Num. 370 
         4. To the Reasons from the Authorities   Num. 371 
   II. To the Initial Arguments   Num. 379 
   III. To the Arguments for the Opinion of Others   Num. 388 
Question Two: Whether the Intellective Part Properly Taken or Something of it is the Total Cause Generating Actual Knowledge, or the Idea of Generating it Num. 401 
   I. Six Opinions of Others are Expounded and Rejected 
      A. About the First Opinion 
         1. Exposition of the Opinion   Num. 407 
         2. Rejection of the Opinion   Num. 413 
      B. About the Second Opinion 
         1. Exposition of the opinion   Num. 422 
         2. Rejection of the Opinion   Num. 427 
      C. About the Third and Fourth Opinion 
         1. Exposition of the Opinions   Num. 450 
         2. Rejection of the Opinions   Num. 452 
      D. About the Fifth and Sixth Opinion 
         1. Exposition of the Opinions   Num. 456 
         2. Rejection of the Opinions   Num. 463 
         3. Rejection of the Sixth Opinion Specifically   Num. 471 
   II. Scotus’ own Opinion   Num. 486 
   III. To the Arguments for the Opinions 
      A. To the Arguments for the First Opinion   Num. 504 
      B. To the Arguments for the Second Opinion   Num. 512 
      C. To the Things Said in the Third and Fourth Opinion   Num. 528 
      D. To the Arguments of the Fifth Opinion   Num. 537 
   IV. To the Initial Arguments   Num. 547 
Question Three: Whether the More Principal Cause of Generated Knowledge is the Object Present in Itself or in the Species, or the Very Intellective Part of the Intellect   Num. 554 
   I. Solution of the Question   Num. 559 
   II. To the Initial Arguments   Num. 563 
Question Four: Whether there is Distinctly in the Mind an Image of the Trinity Num. 569 
   I. To the Question 
      A. About the Image of the Trinity in Us   Num. 574 
      B. Two Doubts   Num. 581 
         1. To the First Doubt   Num. 583 
         2. To the Second Doubt   Num. 588 
         3. Corollary   Num. 594 
   II. To the Initial Arguments   Num. 596